On the poet from Kaprin who chose the language of the orchard and the fireside over the language of institutional prestige, and spent a lifetime insisting it was never as powerless as the world assumed.
In the winter of a village called Kaprin, in a corner of Shopian where the orchards run up against the foothills, a man with no formal schooling of his own would sit by the fire on the long dark evenings and tell stories. He gave his children what had been given to him: Kashmiri and Persian folk tales and mathnavis, recounted on winter nights when there was little else to do once the light went. One of the children listening was a boy his family had named Mohammad Shafi Lone. He would grow up to be known, across Kashmir and increasingly beyond it, by a single word: Shauq. Passion. Enthusiasm. The pen name has, in the decades since, become inseparable from the name on his passport.
 |
| Image Source | Goethe-Institut / Andrea Fernandes |
Shafi Shauq was born on 18 March 1950 in Kaprin, a village in the Shopian district of south Kashmir. His father, as reported in profiles published around his Padma Shri, was a self-taught man with no formal education who owned a small orchard and traded in walnuts. These details recur in several accounts of his early years — most recently in an extended interview with the journalist Majid Maqbool, published in Frontline in February 2026, shortly after his elevation to the Padma Shri.
An Orchard, a Brother, and a Library That Was Spoken Rather Than Shelved
During those winter nights, he would recount Kashmiri and Persian stories, giving the young Shauq an early education in the rhythms of spoken literature — the cadences of a language that lived primarily in the mouth, not on the page. Shauq's own later insistence, decades on, that Kashmiri is fundamentally a spoken tongue rather than a written one, and that it does not depend on texts for its survival, reads almost as a direct inheritance from those firelit evenings.
If his father gave him the raw material, it was his elder brother who gave him direction. Ghulam Nabi Lone — twenty years his senior, and known to Kashmiri letters by his own pen name, Naji Munawar — was a schoolteacher in the village, and a compiler of the poetry of Sheikh-ul-Alam in his own right. Shauq speaks of him without any of the qualifications he applies to almost everything else in his own life: "My brother had a great influence on me. I have virtually learnt from his lap. He was the one who was my first mentor." An institution in south Kashmir carries his name today. It was Naji Munawar who put a stranger set of books into the boy's hands: Lewis Carroll's Alice in Wonderland, Jawaharlal Nehru's Letters from a Father to His Daughter, the Arabian Nights. It is a curious syllabus for a village boy in 1950s Shopian — English nonsense literature, nationalist pedagogy, Perso-Arabic frame narrative — and it points to a household that, whatever its material modesty, treated reading widely as a kind of birthright. Shauq has also spoken of the pull of Urdu writers, Premchand and Krishan Chandra chief among them, and of encountering, in his school years, the poetry of Abdul Ahad Azad in Kashmiri — an encounter he describes as having left an indelible mark. Naji Munawar's own children's poems were among his early reading too, which means that before Shauq had written a line of his own, he had already absorbed his family's habit of writing them.
English by Training, Kashmiri by Conviction
The path that followed was, on its surface, conventional enough for an able student of his generation: a Bachelor of Science in 1970 — which he recalls earning at Anantnag Degree College, then affiliated with the University of Kashmir — followed by an M.A., an M.Phil., and finally a Ph.D. in English, taken directly at the University of Kashmir itself, where he would go on to spend the whole of his working life. (The Government of India's Padma Shri biography records the degree simply as being from the University of Kashmir, without naming the affiliated college.) He joined the faculty — becoming, by his own account, the first permanent faculty member of the University of Kashmir's Department of Kashmiri — and remained there for 33 years, teaching literature and picking up, along the way, a working command of Hindi, Urdu, Sanskrit, and Arabic besides, before retiring as Head of the Department, Dean of the Faculty of Arts, and Dean of the Faculty of Oriental Learning.
What makes the trajectory worth pausing on is not the credential itself but what he did with it. A man trained to the doctoral level in English literature — a field that, in South Asia, has long offered its own routes to institutional prestige — chose Kashmiri as the central language of his literary and linguistic work, even as his output continued to move across Kashmiri, English, Hindi, and Urdu. Kaeshur, the language of the orchard and the fireside, had a smaller literary readership and continuing debates over script and orthography beside the languages he had been formally trained in. Multiple accounts frame that choice as the defining pivot of his career, and it is not hard to see why: it is one thing to love a mother tongue, another to have mastered its academic rival and returned to the smaller language regardless.
A Lexicographer's Devotion
The bibliography that followed is, by his government's own citation, precise rather than merely impressive: more than 106 books authored, edited, or translated across Kashmiri, English, Hindi, and Urdu — the figure recorded in his official Padma Shri citation and repeated across the national wire coverage of the award. What matters beyond the count is the shape of the work, which falls into several distinct registers.
There is, first, the lexicographer and grammarian — the Shauq who treated the Kashmiri language itself as a subject requiring documentation before it could be defended. Kaeshur Lugaat, a comprehensive Kashmiri dictionary, and Kaeshryuk Grammar, a grammar of the language, are described in multiple sources — including his own Padma Shri citation — as among his most important works. To these he added Kaeshri Adabuk Tawaariekh — a history of the Kashmiri language and its literature, per the spelling used in his official Padma Shri citation, though other sources transliterate it as Kaeshir Zaban ti Adibuk Tawaariekh — and a companion volume, Zabaan ti Adab (Language and Literature). Together, they represent a sustained attempt to document the language — its vocabulary, grammar, history, and literary traditions — in works that Shauq himself says serve students and scholars. He also contributed to national reference projects that needed exactly this kind of expertise, including the Encyclopedia of Indian Literature, Medieval Indian Literature, and the Oxford Companion to Indian Theatre — and, in a detail that sits oddly next to the dictionaries, wrote scripts for television serials and films along the way.
There is, second, the poet. His collection Yaad Aasmanan Hinz won the Sahitya Akademi Award in 2006, and other collections — Remembering the Skies and Aa ki Naa among them — extend the body of original verse. Rotary News, in a February 2021 feature recalling the 2006 Frankfurt Book Fair, describes hearing Shauq recite there, and preserves a fragment of one poem in English translation — a poet crossing a street and lowering his head "in case of danger," alert to an absence he senses rather than sees, "nothing as tangible as rocket or gun." It is a small fragment, and reading in it the weight of Kashmir's decades of conflict is this writer's inference rather than Shauq's own stated intent — but the lines do not announce themselves as political poetry in any polemical sense, either.
There is, third, the translator — and this may be the register in which his labour has travelled furthest beyond Kashmir. His Best of Kashmiri Literature series, published in three volumes titled simply Lal, Nund, and Kashmiri Sufi Poetry, and launched at a 2024 event at Srinagar's Sher-i-Kashmir International Conference Centre, carries the mystic poets Lal Ded and Nund Reshi — Sheikh-ul-Alam, the same saint whose verses his brother had once compiled — into forms accessible to readers who do not have Kashmiri. In the Frontline interview, Shauq describes the labour involved in this kind of work with unusual candour: the greatest difficulty, he says, was not vocabulary but context — placing a text in its proper cultural setting, finding what he calls dynamic equivalents for idioms and proverbs, and overcoming what he terms fixed expressions and shibboleth phrases that resist any literal crossing. He is, in the same interview, careful to hedge his own success — "success is always subject to scrutiny," he says — a modesty that sits oddly, and perhaps deliberately, against the scale of what he has translated.
That scale includes fiction as well as verse. Shauq translated Pran Kishore's Kashmiri novel Gul, Gulshan, Gulfam — a work of some four hundred pages tracing Kashmiri identity at the edge of India's economic liberalisation — into English, working alongside the novelist himself; the published edition credits the translation to "Shafi Shauq with Pran Kishore." Kishore later wrote of the choice in the book's own postscript: he counted himself fortunate that "Professor Shafi Shauq agreed to undertake this mammoth task," praising him as a writer equally at home in both languages who kept the novel's local flavour intact. The translation reached, among other readers, contributors to Rotary News, who credit it with introducing them to a writer they had never otherwise have encountered.
The novelist Amit Chaudhuri later drew on the 2006 Frankfurt Book Fair — where India was Guest of Honour that year — in a piece titled "The Actual Shafi Shauq," published in the Indian Express's Sunday Eye section. The account, preserved here through a 2021 Rotary News feature rather than read whole, is best treated as literary testimony rather than documentary biography: Chaudhuri remembered "a small, suited Kashmiri poet" whose presence at the fair seemed almost improbable — a writer from a place so often represented through conflict, appearing instead as a quiet emissary of its literary life.
On Institutions, and Why He Does Not Fear for the Language
If there is a single argument that runs through Shauq's later public statements — interviews given after his retirement, and especially in the wake of the Padma Shri — it is a contrarian one, and worth setting out plainly rather than folding into the biography, because it is where he departs most sharply from the anxieties common among custodians of endangered languages.
Shauq does not believe Kashmiri is dying, and he does not believe the written record is what will save it if it were. In his own words to Majid Maqbool: Kaeshur has been the identity of the Kaeshir people for thousands of years, long before written texts existed, and it will remain their medium of communication as long as Kashmiris are on the face of the earth. The rumour of the language's extinction, he suggests, serves certain individuals' ends — a pointed but unelaborated remark that he does not expand into naming names. The spoken form of a language, in his formulation, is the true index of a community's life; written texts, he argues, are in any case being displaced by newer forms of communication, speech-to-text and its reverse, so that the anxiety over declining readership may be misdirected from the start.
More provocative still is his diagnosis of the threat. Asked how crucial institutional support — schools, colleges, universities — is to the growth of Kashmiri, he answers, in the same interview, that no rhetoric is needed: institutions cause the death of languages and literatures, by subjecting them to pedagogical patterns and time-honoured rules. It is a striking position for a man who spent thirty-three years inside one such institution and rose to lead its Faculty of Arts, and it is offered without apparent irony. He extends the critique to the current debate over Kashmiri orthography, expressing frustration with what he calls the unnecessary diacritical marks devised by certain reformers, and drawing a comparison to English, whose spelling bears only an arbitrary relationship to its pronunciation without that arbitrariness having killed the language. This is a position within an ongoing and unresolved argument among Kashmiri linguists over script and standardisation, not a consensus view, and readers encountering it here should understand it as Shauq's own contested stance rather than settled scholarly opinion.
He is, notably, unsentimental about technological change more broadly. Asked about artificial intelligence, Shauq is reported to have said that AI has not yet produced poetry or fiction in Kashmiri, but that the moment is approaching fast, pointing to tools such as ChatGPT and Copilot, which can already generate rhyming verse in other languages, as evidence of how quickly that boundary is moving. His comments are notably matter-of-fact: he presents AI as another technological change that writers will have to reckon with, characteristic of his wider view that languages survive through use and adaptation, rather than through attempts to freeze them in place.
Recognition, Arriving Late and All at Once
The honours, when they came, were long in arriving relative to the scale of the output, and then arrived in a cluster that makes the delay look almost deliberate in retrospect. A Best Book Award from the Jammu and Kashmir Academy of Art, Culture and Languages reached him in 1995. The Sahitya Akademi Award followed in 2006, for Yaad Aasmanan Hinz, and he also received the Sahitya Akademi Translation Award and the Bharati Bhasha Samman from the Central Institute of Indian Languages. Other honours have included the Jammu and Kashmir State Award for Outstanding Contribution to Languages and Literature, the Best Teacher Award in 2009, the year before his retirement, and the Ahad Zargar Award, reported in biographical accounts as having been given in 2011 for his contribution to Sufi poetry.
 |
| Photo Courtesy: PIB |
Then, on 25 January 2026, ahead of Republic Day, Shafi Shauq was named a recipient of the Padma Shri — India's fourth-highest civilian honour, awarded, in the government's language, for distinguished contribution to education and literature. Speaking to IANS after learning of the honour, Shauq said it was not only recognition of his own contribution to Kashmiri literature but "more an award for the recognition of the literary richness of Kashmir" — a framing consistent with a man who has spent his career arguing that the language belongs to its speakers collectively, not to any one custodian of it, however prolific. Greater Kashmir's coverage noted that the honour was received, in Shopian and Srinagar alike, as a point of pride for a region "often defined by strife rather than its intellectual contributions" — an observation offered by the paper rather than by Shauq, and one that says as much about how Kashmir is written about as it does about the man himself. The award was formally conferred four months later, on 25 May 2026, when President Droupadi Murmu presented it to him in person at the Civil Investiture Ceremony at Rashtrapati Bhavan in New Delhi.
One further detail belongs here, since it bears directly on everything he has argued about institutions and written records. In his native Kaprin, on the same land his father once farmed for walnuts, Shauq has donated his own property to the village. "I have dedicated my land and building in the village to the cause of art and literature," he has said. The premises now function as a public library, open to anyone in Kaprin who wants to read.
What remains, at the far end of this account, is a life organised around a single, quietly stubborn refusal: the refusal, repeated across decades of scholarship and more than a hundred books, to let a language be told it is dying while its speakers are still alive to speak it. Shauq has said, of his own working method, that he holds a firm conviction — that studying the masters across every genre and language is the fundamental principle of originality, and that no work of literature exists in isolation from any other. It is a fittingly unglamorous credo from a man who has spent his life translating between worlds without ever quite leaving the orchard he started in. The boy who once listened to his father's stories by the fire became, in the end, the one doing the remembering — for an entire language, one dictionary, one dead poet's verse, one difficult idiom at a time.
Tags:
Poets & Poetry